您好,登錄后才能下訂單哦!
一、創建臨時表與普通表
SQL> CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE TMP_TEST ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS AS SELECT * FROM emp;
Table created.
SQL> select count(0) from TMP_TEST;
COUNT(0)
----------
14
SQL> CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE TMP_TEST1 ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS AS SELECT * FROM emp;
Table created.
SQL> select count(0) from TMP_TEST1;
COUNT(0)
----------
14
SQL> create table tmp_test2 as select * from emp;
Table created.
SQL> select count(0) from TMP_TEST2;
COUNT(0)
----------
14
--由于創建tmp_test2為ddl,所以TMP_TEST1數據被清空;
SQL> select count(0) from TMP_TEST1;
COUNT(0)
----------
0
--關閉會話重新打開,TMP_TEST數據也被清空
SQL> select count(0) from TMP_TEST;
COUNT(0)
----------
0
二、分別對副本表進行增刪改操作,對比性能,可以發現以下差別:
新增時:臨時表的cr=8,普通表cr=11
修改時:臨時表的cr=3,cost=2;普通表cr=7,cost=3
刪除時:臨時表的cr=3,cost=2;普通表cr=7,cost=3
所以臨時表如果作為運算中間表做增刪改運算時性能皆比普通表高
SQL> insert into SCOTT.TMP_TEST SELECT * FROM SCOTT.emp;
14 rows created.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL ( cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=548 us)
14 14 14 TABLE ACCESS FULL EMP (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=64 us cost=3 size=1218 card=14)
SQL> insert into SCOTT.TMP_TEST1 SELECT * FROM SCOTT.emp;
14 rows created.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL ( cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=566 us)
14 14 14 TABLE ACCESS FULL EMP (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=63 us cost=3 size=1218 card=14)
SQL> insert into SCOTT.TMP_TEST2 SELECT * FROM SCOTT.emp;
14 rows created.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL ( cr=11 pr=2 pw=0 time=784 us)
14 14 14 TABLE ACCESS FULL EMP (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=31 us cost=3 size=1218 card=14)
SQL> delete from SCOTT.TMP_TEST where SAL<=2500;
9 rows deleted.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 DELETE TMP_TEST ( cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=125 us)
9 9 9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=50 us cost=2 size=117 card=9)
SQL> delete from SCOTT.TMP_TEST1 where SAL<=2500;
9 rows deleted.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 DELETE TMP_TEST1 ( cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=161 us)
9 9 9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST1 (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=77 us cost=2 size=117 card=9)
SQL> delete from SCOTT.TMP_TEST2 where SAL<=2500;
9 rows deleted.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 DELETE TMP_TEST2 ( cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=105 us)
9 9 9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST2 (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=13 us cost=3 size=117 card=9)
SQL> update SCOTT.TMP_TEST set sal=sal+100;
5 rows updated.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 UPDATE TMP_TEST ( cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=132 us)
5 5 5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=46 us cost=2 size=65 card=5)
SQL> update SCOTT.TMP_TEST1 set sal=sal+100;
5 rows updated.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 UPDATE TMP_TEST1 ( cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=132 us)
5 5 5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST1 (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=34 us cost=2 size=65 card=5)
SQL> update SCOTT.TMP_TEST2 set sal=sal+100;
5 rows updated.
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 UPDATE TMP_TEST2 ( cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=69 us)
5 5 5 TABLE ACCESS FULL TMP_TEST2 (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=15 us cost=3 size=65 card=5)
免責聲明:本站發布的內容(圖片、視頻和文字)以原創、轉載和分享為主,文章觀點不代表本網站立場,如果涉及侵權請聯系站長郵箱:is@yisu.com進行舉報,并提供相關證據,一經查實,將立刻刪除涉嫌侵權內容。